Última alteração: 2020-07-27
Palavras-chave
Referências
Ammoun R, Suprono MS, Goodacre CJ, Oyoyo U, Carrico CK, Kattadiyil MT. Influence of Tooth Preparation Design and Scan Angulations on the Accuracy of Two Intraoral Digital Scanners: An in Vitro Study Based on 3-Dimensional Comparisons. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(3):201â€206. doi:10.1111/jopr.13148
Alâ€Rimawi A, Shaheen E, Albdour EA, Shujaat S, Politis C, Jacobs R. Trueness of cone beam computed tomography versus intraâ€oral scanner derived threeâ€dimensional digital models: An ex vivo study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2019;30:498–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13434
Coachmann C. et al. Facially generated and cephalometric guided 3D digital design for complete mouth implant rehabilitation: A clinical report. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. V. 117, n. 5, P. 577-586. 2017.
Chiu, A., Chen, Y. W., Hayashi, J., & Sadr, A. (2020). Accuracy of CAD/CAM Digital Impressions with Different Intraoral Scanner Parameters. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 20(4), 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20041157
Fons-Badal C, Alonso Pérez-Barquero J, MartÃnez- MartÃnez N, Faus-López J, Fons-Font A, AgustÃn- Panadero R. A novel, fully digital approach to quantifying volume gain after soft tissue graft surgery. A pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47:614–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jcpe.13235
Jeong ID, et al. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY. 2016.
Joda T, Lenherr P, Dedem P, Kovaltschuk I, Bragger U, Zitzmann NU. Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator’s preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 00, 2016, 1–6 doi: 10.1111/clr.12982
Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, et al. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(2):109â€113. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2019.07.010
Keul C, Güth JF. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(2):735â€745. doi:10.1007/s00784-019-02965-2
Latham J, Ludlow M, Mennito A, Kelly A, Evans Z, Renne W. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(1):85â€95. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.008
Lim, Jung-Hwa et al.Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Volume 119, Issue 2, 225 - 232
Michelinakis G, Apostolakis D, Tsagarakis A, Kourakis G, Pavlakis E. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study [published online ahead of print, 2019 Dec 21]. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;S0022-3913(19)30703-6. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.023
Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(1):36â€42. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024
Ritschl, Lucas & Wolff, Klaus-Dietrich & Erben, Pia & Grill, Florian. (2019). Simultaneous, radiation-free registration of the dentoalveolar position and the face by combining 3D photography with a portable scanner and impression-taking. Head & Face Medicine. 15. 10.1186/s13005-019-0212-x.
Resende, Caio César Dias et al. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Volume 0, Issue 0
Son, K, & Lee, KB. Effect of Tooth Types on the Accuracy of Dental 3D Scanners: An In Vitro Study. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020- 13(7), 1744. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1307174
Treesh, Joshua C. et al. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Volume 120, Issue 3, 382 - 388
Wei D, Di P, Tian J, Zhao Y, Lin Y. Evaluation of intraoral digital impressions for obtaining gingival contour in the esthetic zone: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(4):1401â€1410. doi:10.1007/s00784-019-03105-6
Yılmaz H, Çakmak Özlü F, Karadeniz C, Karadeniz Eİ. Time-Efficiency and Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Models Versus Dental Casts: A Clinical Study. Turk J Orthod 2019; 32(4): 214-8.